Wednesday, July 1, 2009

Gay means unhappy in India

Sday i was browsn thru the TV channels and stumbled on a news channel that was debating the amendment of Section 377, gay rights in India. Now give me a break, is this a topic for discussion? Some1 is a straight or a gay or a lesb., how does it really bother you? Who are we to debate on what ones orientation should be. There was this lady (on TV) yesterday who said, by legalising gay culture in India, we would spoil the traditions of the country, the next generation would get spoilt; and that we would do this at the expense of placating a minority. Now look who's talking about placating the minority, India?? In India we have always fucked the majority's interests by giving undue privileges to the minority. I wonder why none opened their mouths when reservations were being made at every level. The lady also mentioned that this section is shfting focus from the women's reservation bill. Lemme not comment on that and waste the space in my blog.
I jus hope the erudite men in our govt. do not criminalize certain postures in bed, by illegalising a doggie, or a man on top equating them to defaming the women. But considering this is India I can expect anythng here

2 comments:

  1. Finally some sane judgement
    http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Delhi-High-Court-legalizes-homosexuality/articleshow/4726608.cms

    ReplyDelete
  2. Cult stuff da!
    Especially the analogy on Man on top!

    ReplyDelete